質問 23
組織は、新しいサービスがどのように使用されるかについての情報をまとめています。各関係者がサービスをどのように体験するかを検討しています。これまでサプライヤーは信頼できなかったため、組織はサービス導入の主なリスクと依存関係を特定したいと考えています。これは何の一例ですか?
Explanation
The correct answer is B. Value stream mapping. This is because value stream mapping is a technique that helps to visualize how a service delivers value to the stakeholders, and identify the risks, dependencies, inefficiencies, and opportunities for improvement along the way12. Value stream mapping involves defining the service vision, mapping the current state, analyzing the current state, designing the future state, and implementing the future state12. By considering how each set of stakeholders will experience the service, the organization is defining the service vision and mapping the current state of the service.
A: An agile approach is not the correct answer, because an agile approach is a way of working that is flexible, iterative, and adaptive to changing requirements and feedback34. An agile approach does not necessarily involve compiling information about how a new service will be used, or considering how each set of stakeholders will experience the service.
C: Workforce planning is not the correct answer, because workforce planning is a process that ensures that an organization has the right people with the right skills at the right time to deliver its objectives . Workforce planning does not necessarily involve compiling information about how a new service will be used, or considering how each set of stakeholders will experience the service.
D: Shift left is not the correct answer, because shift left is a practice that aims to resolve issues as close as possible to their source, and prevent them from escalating to higher levels of support . Shift left does not necessarily involve compiling information about how a new service will be used, or considering how each set of stakeholders will experience the service. References:
ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Sample Paper – English, page 9, question 2, answer B ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Candidate Syllabus – English, page 10, learning outcome 1.4 ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Course Online – Simplilearn, section 3.2, lesson 3.2.1, topic
“Agile Approach”
ITIL 4 Managing Professional: Transition Module | Axelos, page 2, section “ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module”
[ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Course Online – Simplilearn], section 3.2, lesson 3.2.3, topic
“Workforce Planning”
[ITIL 4 MP Transition: a transformed framework | Axelos], paragraph 4, sentence 2
[ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Course Online – Simplilearn], section 3.2, lesson 3.2.4, topic
“Shift Left”
[Course: ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition | ITIL USA], paragraph 3, sentence 3
質問 24
サービス プロバイダーは、サービス コンシューマとパートナーシップ関係にあります。提供されるサービスは複雑で、アジャイル手法を使用して常に新しい機能と改善が開発されています。
サービスの価値を検証するための最良のアプローチはどれですか?
Explanation
The best approach for validating service value in a partnership relationship with a service consumer is to work together to identify methods of checking service value andcheck that value propositions are still valid. This is because this approach aligns with the ITIL 4 guiding principles of focus on value, collaborate and promote visibility, and progress iteratively with feedback1.
By working together, the service provider and the service consumer can co-create value and ensure that the services delivered meet the needs and expectations of the service consumer and other stakeholders. They can also share information and feedback, and adjust the services accordingly to respond to changing requirements and opportunities. Moreover, they can jointly define the criteria and indicators for measuring and validating the value of the services, such as the outcomes, costs, risks, and benefits23.
The value propositions of the services are the statements that describe the benefits and value that the services offer to the service consumer and other stakeholders. They are based on the understanding of the service consumer’s needs, preferences, and goals. The value propositions should be regularly reviewed and validated to ensure that they are still relevant and accurate, and that they reflect the current and future value of the services45.
The other options are not the best approach for validating service value, because they are either too narrow, too passive, or too reactive. They do not involve the active collaboration and co-creation of value between the service provider and the service consumer, nor do they account for the complexity and agility of the services provided.
References: 1: ITIL 4 Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition, AXELOS, 2019, p. 13-15 2: ITIL 4 Direct, Plan and Improve, AXELOS, 2019, p. 97-98 3: Reporting on value in service management, AXELOS, 2021, 3 4: ITIL 4 Create, Deliver and Support, AXELOS, 2019, p. 17-18 5: ITIL 4 Drive Stakeholder Value, AXELOS, 2019, p.
25-26