2026年08月実際に出るNEA-BC試験問題集には正確で更新された問題 [Q101-Q125]

質問101、 Which of the following is NOT likely to contribute to conflict in healthcare settings?

Cultural diversity.

Stress associated with caregiving.

Common goals.

Blame placing.

In healthcare settings, various factors can contribute to conflicts. Understanding these contributing factors is crucial for managing and preventing disputes effectively. Below, we explore each factor listed in the question and explain why “Common goals” is not likely to contribute to conflict.
**Cultural Diversity:** Cultural diversity refers to the presence of individuals from various cultural backgrounds within the healthcare setting. This diversity can include differences in languages, beliefs, practices, and values. While cultural diversity can enrich a workplace by bringing in multiple perspectives and expertise, it can also lead to misunderstandings and conflicts if not managed sensitively. Healthcare professionals might interpret behaviors or communications differently based on their cultural contexts, potentially leading to disagreements or conflicts. Effective communication and cultural competence training are essential to manage this diversity constructively.
**Common Goals:** Unlike cultural diversity, common goals are not a source of conflict but rather a means to mitigate it. In healthcare, common goals might include improving patient outcomes, enhancing service efficiency, or promoting a safe environment for both staff and patients. When team members focus on shared objectives, it fosters collaboration and minimizes individual or departmental conflicts. Focusing on common goals helps align team members and reduces the emphasis on individual agendas or differences. Therefore, common goals are typically seen as a unifying factor, helping to bridge gaps between diverse team members and preventing conflicts.
**Stress Associated with Caregiving:** Healthcare professionals often work under intense stress due to high stakes, emotional strain, long hours, and the demanding nature of their jobs. This stress can exacerbate tensions among staff, leading to conflicts. For instance, a nurse working long shifts might become irritable, which could affect interactions with colleagues. Similarly, physicians under pressure to make quick decisions might react negatively to questioning or suggestions from other staff, leading to disputes. Managing this stress is crucial to prevent it from escalating into conflict.
**Blame Placing:** Blame placing, or the act of attributing faults or mistakes to others, is a direct contributor to conflicts in healthcare settings. It can create an environment of mistrust and defensiveness, where team members are more focused on protecting themselves rather than collaborating towards common goals or patient care. This behavior can lead to breakdowns in team cohesion and communication, significantly affecting the quality of care and the workplace atmosphere. To summarize, while cultural diversity, stress associated with caregiving, and blame placing can all contribute to conflicts in healthcare settings, common goals do the opposite by helping to defuse potential conflicts and refocus the team on shared objectives. By emphasizing common goals, healthcare teams can enhance collaboration and improve outcomes, making “Common Goals” the correct answer to the question of what is NOT likely to contribute to conflict.

質問102、 Major diagnostic categories (MDCs) are collections of

Diagnosis related groups

Nursing specialties

Treatment options

Patient outcomes

Major Diagnostic Categories (MDCs) are broad classifications used within the healthcare system, particularly in the context of the U.S. Medicare program, to organize hospital cases into groups that are similar clinically and in terms of the resources they require for treatment. Each MDC corresponds to a single organ system or etiology and in principle is associated with a particular medical specialty. This categorization system is an integral part of the Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs), which are used to determine how much Medicare pays the hospital for each “product,” which in this case is the patient’s stay.
There are over 400 different DRGs, each defined by a combination of diagnoses, procedures, age, sex, discharge status, and the presence of complications or comorbidities. These DRGs are then grouped into 25 Major Diagnostic Categories. Each MDC covers a specific type of medical condition. For example, one MDC might cover diseases of the respiratory system while another covers diseases of the circulatory system.
Like DRGs, MDCs serve mainly administrative and financial management purposes rather than clinical ones. Their primary use is in the management of hospital billing and healthcare policies, particularly relating to reimbursement under Medicare. Hospitals are reimbursed based on the DRG to which a patient’s case is assigned, which in turn is grouped under an MDC. This system aims to standardize payments and encourage efficiency in healthcare delivery without compromising the quality of care.
The linkage of DRGs, and thus indirectly of MDCs, to Medicare reimbursements impacts various aspects of healthcare delivery. It influences hospital behavior, resource allocation, treatment decisions, and overall healthcare policy. Understanding the structure and function of MDCs and DRGs is essential for administrators, healthcare providers, and policymakers who navigate the complexities of healthcare financing and strive to improve patient outcomes while controlling costs.

質問103、 Which of the following terms would be the most correct for the description of an unintentional tort that is alleged to occur when the person delivers substandard care?

Fraud

Harassment

Negligence

None of the above

質問104、 A research study is being performed, using several hospital patients. A case manager has been asked to investigate to ensure the rights of the patients are not breached. The case manager found:
-The trial met all requirements provided by the Journal of the American Medical Association
-All patients gave consent
-The research was properly used
Which of the following is not a requirement provided by the Journal of the American Medical Association that should be followed for clinical research of patients?

Scientific validity.

Low benefit ratio.

Value in the research.

Fair subject selection.

The question you’ve presented asks which of the listed options is *not* a requirement provided by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) for the ethical conduct of clinical research. According to the information you’ve provided, the seven requirements by JAMA for evaluating the ethics of clinical research include: 1. **Value** – Research should have the potential to lead to improvements in health or well-being. 2. **Scientific Validity** – Research should be methodologically rigorous. 3. **Fair Subject Selection** – Subjects should be chosen fairly to ensure that the benefits and burdens of research are distributed without prejudice. 4. **Favorable Risk-Benefit Ratio** – The potential benefits of the research should outweigh the risks involved. 5. **Independent Review** – Research should be reviewed by an independent committee to ensure objectivity. 6. **Informed Consent** – Participants should be fully informed about the research and consent voluntarily. 7. **Respect for Enrolled Subjects** – Participants’ rights and privacy should be respected and protected throughout the research process. Given these requirements, let’s evaluate the options provided in the question- ** Scientific Validity** – This is clearly listed as one of the seven requirements for ethical clinical research by JAMA. – **Low Benefit Ratio** – This option contradicts the actual requirement from JAMA, which is a *favorable risk-benefit ratio*. A low benefit ratio would imply that the risks outweigh the benefits, which would be unethical under the JAMA guidelines. – **Value in the Research** – As mentioned, value is one of the necessary ethical requirements. – **Fair Subject Selection** – This too is explicitly listed as one of the requirements. From this analysis, the option that is *not* a requirement by JAMA for clinical research is the **Low Benefit Ratio**. Instead, JAMA mandates a favorable risk-benefit ratio, where the benefits of the research should significantly outweigh the risks.

質問105、 What does Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Law (EMTALA) require?

A lower standard of care for indigent patients requiring emergency treatment.

Overloaded hospitals to discharge indigent patients in order to make room for patients who have the means to pay.

Hospitals unwilling to treat patients to send them to other hospitals for emergency care.

Hospitals to provide emergency care to indigent and uninsured patients.

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) is a federal law in the United States that requires hospitals to provide care to anyone needing emergency healthcare treatment regardless of citizenship, legal status, or ability to pay. Passed in 1986, its intent is to prevent hospitals from rejecting patients, delaying treatment, or engaging in patient “dumping” – the practice of refusing to treat indigent or uninsured patients by either denying care or transferring them to another hospital when they have emergency medical conditions.
Under EMTALA, the obligations of the hospitals are clear: 1. When a patient comes to an emergency department, they must be provided with an appropriate medical screening to determine if an emergency medical condition exists. This screening must be done without delay and cannot be contingent on the individual’s insurance status or ability to pay. 2. If the screening reveals that an emergency medical condition exists, the hospital is mandated to either provide treatment until the condition is resolved or stabilized, or, if the hospital does not have the necessary capability, arrange for a transfer to another hospital that can provide the appropriate care.
The law applies to all hospitals in the United States that participate in the Medicare program and have an emergency department. This ensures that the provisions of the law cover a broad range of institutions and protect individuals across different states and communities.
EMTALA’s requirements are crucial for protecting the rights and health of the most vulnerable populations, including the indigent and uninsured. By doing so, the law upholds a fundamental principle of healthcare equity, ensuring that no individual is denied emergency services based on their financial capacity. Moreover, the law prohibits hospitals from engaging in practices that prioritize financial considerations over patient care needs during emergency situations.
Violation of EMTALA can result in significant penalties for hospitals and physicians, including fines and possible exclusion from participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs. These strict penalties underline the importance of compliance and ensure that hospitals adhere to the guidelines set forth by the law, thus safeguarding patient rights and access to necessary medical care in emergency situations.

質問106、 The method used to group or categorize a patient according to specific criteria and care requirements is known as which of the following?

clinical pathway

patient classification system

patient acuity

patient care delivery model

質問107、 A patient is receiving a medication for pain that makes her itch. The physician has ordered another medication as an alternative, but the nightshift nurse continues with the previous medication because it makes the patient “rest better.” The Nurse Executive’s charge staff nurse comes to her with this problem and conveys that the staff nurse providing night shift care has offered the patient no alternatives. The Nurse Executive knows that this is a violation of:

patient’s right to be informed about alternative treatments or procedures

patient’s right to expect that all communications and records concerning his or her care will be treated confidential

patient’s right to know if any of the people treating his or her have any professional relationships among themselves that might affect his or her care

No rights have been violated.

The scenario described involves a patient who has been prescribed a new medication by her physician due to the side effects (itching) of the previous pain medication. Despite the physician’s directive, the nightshift nurse continues to administer the original medication, claiming it helps the patient rest better, and does not inform the patient about the alternative medication prescribed by the physician.
The fundamental issue at hand here pertains to the patient’s rights, specifically the right to be informed about alternative treatments or procedures. This right ensures that patients are given comprehensive information about the different options available for their treatment, enabling them to make informed decisions about their own healthcare. The right to be informed is a crucial aspect of patient consent, where the patient must have adequate knowledge to agree to or refuse a particular medical treatment.
In this case, by not informing the patient of the alternative medication that has been prescribed specifically to alleviate a troubling side effect, the nightshift nurse is essentially denying the patient the opportunity to make an informed choice about her treatment. This omission not only undermines the physician’s treatment plan but also violates the patient’s autonomy and right to participate actively in her own care.
The Nurse Executive, upon learning about this issue from the charge staff nurse, should recognize it as a breach of the patient’s rights. It is important for healthcare providers to adhere to the principles of informed consent, which include discussing potential benefits, risks, and alternatives with the patient. The failure to do so not only contravenes medical ethics but also legal standards pertaining to patient care and safety.
To address this violation, the Nurse Executive should ensure that the nightshift nurse is informed about the importance of respecting patient rights and following physician orders. Additionally, corrective actions such as retraining or disciplinary measures might be considered to prevent future occurrences. Importantly, the patient should be immediately informed about the alternative medication available to her, ensuring her right to informed choice is respected.
In conclusion, the incident described is a clear violation of the patient’s right to be informed about alternative treatments or procedures. This right is fundamental in ensuring that patients are active participants in their own healthcare, capable of making choices that best suit their personal health needs. Thus, it is imperative that healthcare providers uphold these rights diligently to provide ethical and effective care.

質問108、 You are part of a community health initiative that draws on partnerships with academic, health care, and social service agencies. Which of the following is likely to contribute to miscommunication among partner agencies?

Use of organization or discipline specific jargon by each partner.

Agreeing upon a common language to be used among partners.

Working in a community that is primarily non-English speaking.

Agreeing upon clearly defined roles for each organizational partner.

The use of organization- or discipline-specific jargon by each partner in a community health initiative involving multiple agencies is a significant factor that can contribute to miscommunication. When agencies from academic, healthcare, and social service sectors collaborate, each one often comes with its own set of terminologies and professional languages that are specific to their field of expertise.
Jargon refers to specialized or technical language that is used by a particular group or profession and may not be understood outside that group. For example, medical professionals use terms that are quite specific to healthcare, while academics might use language that is specific to their research fields. Social service agencies also have their own sets of terms that might be unfamiliar to those outside their specific area of work.
When these different sets of terminologies are used in cross-disciplinary meetings or communications without proper translation or explanation, misunderstandings can occur. This is because not all participants may be familiar with the jargon used by other partners. Miscommunication can lead to errors in implementing programs, misalignment of objectives, and inefficiencies in managing resources and activities.
Furthermore, reliance on discipline-specific jargon not only obstructs clear communication but can also undermine trust among partners. When participants do not fully understand discussions or the implications of what is being communicated, it may lead to feelings of exclusion or skepticism regarding the intentions or capacities of others. This can weaken the collaborative spirit essential for the success of community health initiatives.
To mitigate these risks, it is crucial for all partners involved in a community health initiative to agree upon and use a common language that is clear and accessible to everyone involved. This might involve consciously avoiding or clearly defining technical terms, and perhaps even developing a glossary of terms that all partners agree to use. Through these efforts, all parties can ensure that communication is effective, thereby fostering a cooperative and trusting environment conducive to achieving shared goals.

質問109、 If two individuals or groups have an interaction that is characterized by a behavior that is meant to oppress the opponent, defeat or reduce the other party, it would be considered as which of the following?

Conflict situation

Anger management

Defeat goals

Stressful goals

質問110、 A staff nurse is charging a hospital patient’s account for supplies that she is taking home for personal use. The Nurse Executive knows that this is:

fraud

abuse

waste

all of the above

In the scenario where a staff nurse is charging hospital supplies to a patient’s account for her personal use, the correct classification of this action is fraud. Here’s why:
Fraud, by definition, involves intentional deception or misrepresentation that a person commits knowing that it could result in an unauthorized benefit to themselves or to others. In this case, the nurse knowingly misrepresents the destination of the supplies by charging them to a patient’s account instead of paying for them herself. This deceit is done with the intention of personal gain, which clearly falls under the category of fraud.
To further clarify, let’s differentiate fraud from other related but distinct terms often used in discussions of corporate compliance: abuse and waste. Abuse refers to practices that, while not necessarily illegal, are inconsistent with sound fiscal, business, or medical practices. These practices generally lead to an unnecessary cost to the organization, or in some cases, to poorer healthcare outcomes. However, abuse might not involve the deliberate intent to deceive that is characteristic of fraud.
Waste, on the other hand, involves the mismanagement of resources that results in unnecessary costs. This could be due to inefficiencies or errors that do not necessarily involve dishonesty or moral wrongdoing. Waste is often preventable and is usually linked to poor decision-making processes or oversight rather than deliberate misconduct.
In the nurse’s situation, although one might argue that her actions could also constitute abuse and waste, the dominant factor here is her deliberate action of misleading the hospital and the patient for her personal benefit, which directly aligns with the definition of fraud. Therefore, labeling this action as fraud is the most accurate classification, emphasizing the intentional and deceptive nature of her misconduct.
Understanding these distinctions is crucial in corporate compliance to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to prevent, detect, and respond to such misconduct effectively. Recognizing the specific nature of the offense helps in applying the right remedies and sanctions and in reinforcing an ethical culture within the organization.

質問111、 In terms of research reliability which of the following correlation coefficients is considered an acceptable level of reliability?

.35

.55

.70

.80

In the realm of research, reliability refers to the consistency or repeatability of an instrument’s measurements. When a measurement tool assesses the same characteristic consistently under the same conditions, it is considered reliable. The reliability of such instruments is quantitatively assessed through correlation coefficients, which range from -1.00 to +1.00. A correlation coefficient of +1.00 indicates perfect reliability, meaning every time the instrument is used, it yields the same results under identical conditions.
The question at hand involves determining which correlation coefficient among several options signifies an acceptable level of reliability for a research instrument. The options given were .35, .80, .55, and .70. The correct answer is .80. This is based on the general consensus in research methodology that a correlation coefficient of .80 or higher is deemed acceptable for most research purposes. This threshold ensures that the instrument is sufficiently consistent in its measurements, allowing researchers to have confidence in the repeatability and thus the reliability of the results.
It is crucial to understand that while a correlation coefficient of .80 is acceptable, it is not indicative of perfect reliability. However, achieving a coefficient of 1.00 in practical research scenarios is extremely rare and often not necessary. The acceptable level of reliability might vary slightly depending on the specific requirements of the study or the critical nature of the data being measured. For example, in high-stakes research areas, such as clinical trials for new medical treatments, a higher reliability coefficient might be required compared to studies in less critical fields.
In conclusion, a correlation coefficient of .80 is generally considered an acceptable level of reliability in most research contexts. This benchmark helps researchers determine the usability of their measurement instruments, ensuring that their findings are based on consistent and repeatable measurements. Understanding and applying the concept of reliability is essential for conducting robust and credible research.

質問112、 Which of the following is NOT true of workplace politics?

They are usually the result of a climate set by upper management.

Long-term employees may have a major influence on workplace climate and politics.

They are always petty or negative.

Awareness of workplace politics is key to being successful as an employee.

質問113、 The translation and application phase of the Stetler model for research utilization involves determining exactly what knowledge will be used and how that knowledge will be applied to practice. An informal use of the research knowledge to modify one’s way of thinking or appreciation of an issue is which of the following?

symbolic use

political use

instrument application

cognitive application

The Stetler model of research utilization is designed to aid in the practical application of research findings to improve clinical practices and outcomes. It consists of several phases, with one of the key phases being the translation and application phase. During this phase, the focus is on determining the specific pieces of knowledge that will be used and the means by which this knowledge will be integrated into practice. This phase is crucial because it bridges the gap between theory and practice, ensuring that research findings are not only understood but also effectively implemented to enhance patient care and healthcare processes. In regards to the types of research utilization, the Stetler model identifies three main categories: 1. **Cognitive use** – This involves using research findings to change or enhance one’s understanding or thinking about a particular issue. It is an internal process where knowledge influences thinking rather than directly dictating specific actions. 2. **Instrumental use** – This type of application refers to the direct utilization of research findings to inform specific, practical actions. It involves concrete changes in practices or the implementation of new procedures based on research evidence. 3. **Symbolic use** – In this category, research is used to conceptually justify decisions or positions already taken. It may serve more of a political or persuasive purpose rather than leading to new or altered practices. The correct answer to the question regarding the informal use of research knowledge to modify one’s way of thinking or appreciation of an issue falls under **cognitive application**. This term describes the process where research knowledge influences an individual’s cognitive framework or understanding without necessarily prompting immediate, tangible changes in practice. Cognitive application is about the subtle yet impactful ways that new knowledge can reshape our perspectives and conceptual understandings, often serving as a precursor to more visible changes in behavior or practice. Understanding this distinction is crucial for healthcare professionals and researchers as it highlights the multifaceted ways in which research can be integrated into the healthcare setting. Recognizing that not all uses of research lead directly to action but can still significantly influence clinical thinking and decision-making processes underlines the broad impact that informed knowledge can have within the medical field.

質問114、 Which of the following is NOT required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)?

establishment of a minimum wage

limitation of the number of hours in a day or days in a week an employee may be required or scheduled to work, including overtime hours, if the employee is at least 16 years old

payment of overtime rate after a set maximum number of hours set by the law in any week

payment by cash or by check of minimum wage and overtime compensation payments

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), enacted in 1938, is a federal law that establishes various labor standards, intending to protect worker rights in the private sector as well as in federal, state, and local governments. Among the key provisions, the FLSA establishes minimum wage, overtime pay eligibility, recordkeeping standards, and child labor regulations. Let’s analyze the options provided to determine which is NOT required by the FLSA:
1. **Establishment of a minimum wage:** The FLSA does require the establishment of a minimum wage. As of my last update, the federal minimum wage is set at $7.25 per hour, although many states and cities have higher minimum wages. This provision aims to ensure a minimum standard of living to protect the health and well-being of employees.
2. **Limitation of the number of hours in a day or days in a week an employee may be required or scheduled to work, including overtime hours, if the employee is at least 16 years old:** The FLSA does not limit the number of hours employees aged 16 and older can work either daily or weekly. This aspect of labor regulation is left to the discretion of employers and employees, who can negotiate work hours as they see fit. This means that this statement is NOT a requirement of the FLSA.
3. **Payment of overtime rate after a set maximum number of hours set by the law in any week:** The FLSA does require employers to pay overtime rates to eligible employees. Under the FLSA, non-exempt employees must receive overtime pay for hours worked over 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than time and one-half their regular rates of pay. This provision is crucial for compensating workers fairly for longer work hours.
4. **Payment by cash or by check of minimum wage and overtime compensation payments:** The FLSA mandates that employers must pay their employees the wages they are legally entitled to, including minimum wage and overtime, in a timely manner. This can be done via cash, check, direct deposit, or other means agreed upon by the employer and employee, as long as the employee has access to their full wages.
In conclusion, the statement about the FLSA not requiring “limitation of the number of hours in a day or days in a week an employee may be required or scheduled to work, including overtime hours, if the employee is at least 16 years old” is the correct answer. This provision is not part of the FLSA’s requirements, distinguishing it from the other options listed, all of which are actual mandates under the FLSA.

質問115、 The management system that examined the whole of an organization, not merely its parts and stressed competency rather than favoritism as a driver is which of the following?

scientific management

human relations management

process management

behavioral science management

The correct answer to the question is “process management.” This management approach differs significantly from others like scientific management, human relations management, and behavioral science management by focusing on the entire organization as a system of interconnected processes rather than just individual components or factors.
Process management is rooted in the belief that all aspects of an organization must be aligned and integrated to improve efficiency and achieve organizational goals effectively. This approach views an organization as a set of processes that transform inputs (resources such as raw materials, information, and labor) into outputs (products or services) desired by customers. By examining the organization as a whole, process management seeks to optimize and streamline workflows, reduce redundancies, and eliminate bottlenecks.
Another core principle of process management is its emphasis on competency and systematic governance over favoritism or arbitrary decision-making. This means that decisions within the organization are made based on data, systematic analysis, and established processes rather than personal preferences or informal practices. This systematic approach helps ensure fairness and efficiency, fostering a merit-based culture where employees are recognized and rewarded based on their performance and contribution to the organization.
Furthermore, rules in process management are clearly defined and documented. These rules provide a framework for operations, ensuring consistency and predictability in how tasks are performed. This structured environment not only helps in maintaining order but also aids in compliance and quality control across the organization.
Lastly, process management acknowledges the importance of adequately compensating workers. This is based on the understanding that fair compensation contributes to employee satisfaction and motivation, which are crucial for maintaining productivity and quality of work. By ensuring that compensation is tied to the clarity of roles, responsibilities, and performance, process management helps in creating a more engaged and motivated workforce.
In summary, process management stands out as a comprehensive approach that integrates various parts of an organization into a cohesive system focused on efficiency, fairness, and continuous improvement. It contrasts with other management styles by emphasizing holistic analysis, rule-based governance, competency, and fair compensation.

質問116、 All of the following are the purposes of management theory EXCEPT:

to create a surplus

to establish an environment where people can accomplish goals

to utilize the least amount of time, money, materials, and personal dissatisfaction

to achieve a desired goal by the use of others’ resources

The question presented asks to identify the option that is NOT a purpose of management theory among several choices. The correct answer is given as “to achieve a desired goal by the use of others’ resources.” To understand why this is the correct answer, it is crucial to comprehend what management theory encompasses. Management theories are frameworks that are used to understand, predict, and manage aspects of business operations. These theories have evolved to address changing needs and conditions within business environments but generally focus on how to effectively and efficiently achieve organizational goals.
The primary goals of management theories typically include creating a surplus, establishing an environment conducive to goal achievement, and utilizing resources (time, money, materials) efficiently to minimize personal dissatisfaction. These aims encapsulate the essence of management which is to maximize output while minimizing input and creating a sustainable and productive organizational climate.
The incorrect choice, “to achieve a desired goal by the use of others’ resources,” while seemingly appropriate, subtly distorts the essence of management theory. This choice implies exploitation or unethical utilization of external resources for achieving goals, which contradicts the ethical framework that modern management theories advocate. Management is fundamentally about the responsible stewardship of resources which include human, financial, physical, and informational resources under the manager’s control, not necessarily about using “others’ resources” in a way that suggests taking advantage of other entities or individuals.
Moreover, modern management theory often emphasizes sustainability, ethical leadership, and corporate social responsibility, all of which are contrary to the idea of using others’ resources without mutual benefit or fair compensation. Hence, while management involves achieving goals and may indeed utilize external resources, it aims to do so within a framework of ethical practice and mutual benefit rather than mere exploitation or unilateral benefit.
Therefore, the correct answer highlights an option that is not aligned with the foundational principles of management theories. It points out an approach that management theory does not support, distinguishing it from the other choices that represent legitimate purposes and goals of effective management practices.

質問117、 What type of diagnosis is a head injury?

High-risk.

High-cost.

Catastrophic.

Sentinel.

質問118、 What type of evaluation is goal-oriented?

Evaluations do not focus on this.

Process evaluations.

Structure evaluations.

Outcome evaluations.

質問119、 A care plan is being planned out for a patient with a hyperactive thyroid. The patient wants to complete the planned goals. After the goals were planned, no further action was taken. The care plan was evaluated by the case management team. They found:
-The only information in the plan was the goals
-No additional data for goals was given
Given the information, what was missing from the plan, which made it ineffective?

Information on how to evaluate the intervention.

A diagnosis.

Nursing plan orders.

Both A and C.

In the scenario described, the care plan for a patient with a hyperactive thyroid was found to be ineffective by the case management team. The primary issue identified was that the plan only contained the goals, with no additional information or steps outlined to achieve these goals. This incomplete planning resulted in the care plan being ineffective.
When creating a comprehensive care plan, several key components need to be included to ensure it is actionable and effective. These generally fall into four main categories: 1. **Diagnoses/Problems:** This should clearly state the medical diagnosis or health issues needing management, such as a hyperactive thyroid in this case. 2. **Goals/Outcomes:** These are the targeted results that the health care team wishes to achieve through their interventions. 3. **Nursing Orders:** These are specific instructions for the care that will be provided by the nursing staff. Nursing orders should detail the interventions required to reach the goals set forth in the care plan. 4. **Evaluations:** This section should detail how the effectiveness of the interventions will be measured and monitored over time.
In the provided scenario, it was noted that the care plan lacked sufficient details beyond the initial goals. Specifically, the plan was missing: – **Nursing Orders:** There were no specific interventions or nursing actions outlined that should be taken to manage the patient’s hyperactive thyroid. Without these orders, the nursing staff lacks guidance on how to care for the patient effectively. – **Evaluations:** There was no information on how the intervention’s effectiveness would be evaluated. This is crucial for determining whether the care plan is working or if adjustments are necessary.
As a result of these missing components, the care plan was rendered ineffective because it did not provide a clear roadmap for the healthcare providers. It merely stated what needed to be achieved (the goals) without detailing how these goals would be achieved and how their success would be measured.
In conclusion, for a care plan to be effective, especially for a patient with specific medical needs like a hyperactive thyroid, it must be comprehensive. It should include not only the goals but also detailed nursing orders and a robust evaluation method. This ensures that every member of the healthcare team understands their role and responsibilities in managing the patient’s condition effectively and can adjust the care plan based on the evaluation results to better meet the patient’s health needs.

質問120、 Which of the following techniques would be least appropriate for dealing with conflict?

interpreting the employee’s message correctly

using “you” statements to verbalize feelings

clarifying issues with questions that can be answered yes or no

encouraging venting

When dealing with conflict, particularly in a workplace setting, the manner in which feelings and concerns are communicated can significantly impact the outcome of the interaction. Among the various techniques for addressing conflict, using “you” statements to verbalize feelings is considered to be one of the least effective and potentially most inflammatory methods. Let’s explore why this is the case and why alternative communication strategies are preferred.
“You” statements typically place the focus on the other person and can come across as accusatory, which often leads to defensiveness from the receiving party. For example, saying “You always submit your reports late” directly targets the person and attributes blame, which may escalate the conflict rather than resolve it. This approach can make the other individual feel attacked and less willing to engage in a constructive dialogue, thereby shutting down effective communication.
In contrast, “I” statements allow the speaker to express their feelings and perspectives without casting blame. For instance, rephrasing the previous example to “I feel concerned when the reports are submitted late because it affects the project timeline” focuses on the speaker’s feelings and the impact of the action, rather than on the person’s character or intentions. This method tends to be more effective in fostering a positive dialogue because it expresses personal feelings and invites collaboration on finding a solution without causing defensiveness.
Encouraging the use of “I” statements in conflict resolution is crucial because it helps maintain a respectful and constructive environment. It enables all parties involved to express their feelings and needs openly and honestly without fear of reprisal or escalating the conflict. This approach not only facilitates a more empathetic understanding but also promotes a problem-solving attitude among participants.
As a supervisor or anyone in a position of leadership, adopting and promoting communication techniques that emphasize personal responsibility and respect is essential. Training and encouraging team members to use “I” statements can lead to more effective and harmonious interactions, fostering a workplace culture that values constructive conflict resolution and open communication.
Therefore, while techniques like interpreting messages correctly, asking clarifying questions, and even allowing some venting can be part of effective conflict resolution, using “you” statements generally proves to be counterproductive. It is for these reasons that using “you” statements to verbalize feelings is considered the least appropriate technique in managing conflicts effectively.

質問121、 In systems theory, throughput is defined as

The process of transforming inputs into goods or services

The products or services generated by a system

The components that interact to produce a product or service

The cost of providing goods or services

In systems theory, throughput is a fundamental concept that pertains to the internal processes of a system that convert inputs into outputs. The definition of throughput is: “The process of transforming inputs into goods or services.” This definition underscores the importance of throughput as a measure of efficiency and effectiveness within any system, be it industrial, technological, or organizational.
To further understand throughput, it is essential to contextualize it within the framework of systems theory, which typically identifies three core components of any system: inputs, outputs, and throughput. Inputs are the resources such as raw materials, information, or energy that are fed into the system. Outputs are the final products or results generated by the system after processing the inputs. Throughput, then, is the mechanism or series of processes that convert these inputs into outputs. It involves all the operational procedures, technologies, and human activities that contribute to this transformation.
For example, in a manufacturing setting, inputs might include raw materials, labor, and machinery. The throughput processes could involve assembly lines, quality control checks, and refinement processes that transform these raw materials into finished goods, which are the outputs. In a service-oriented context like healthcare, inputs might be medical supplies and patient information, while throughput involves the medical assessments, treatments, and administrative processes that result in patient care services.
It is crucial to differentiate throughput from other related terms such as productivity or efficiency. While these concepts are interconnected, throughput specifically refers to the rate and quality of processing inputs into outputs without directly quantifying the output. It focuses on the internal workings and the effectiveness of the transformation processes within the system.
Understanding throughput is vital for optimizing and improving a system’s performance. By analyzing and enhancing throughput, organizations can achieve higher productivity, reduce costs, and improve overall efficiency. This makes throughput an essential metric and focus for managers and engineers who aim to streamline operations and increase the output quality.
In summary, throughput in systems theory provides a critical lens through which the internal dynamics of a system are viewed and analyzed. It is the bridge between what enters a system and what leaves it, emphasizing the transformative processes that add value to the inputs and create functional and marketable outputs.

質問122、 The medical services that an organization offers falls under which of the 4 Ps?

Price.

Promotion.

Product.

Place.

質問123、 What is the difference in the net income and the gross income?

The net income is the income that remains when expenses have been subtracted from total revenue and the gross income is the total income received before expenses are deducted.

The gross income is the income that remains when expenses have been subtracted from total revenue and the net income is the total income received before expenses are deducted.

The net income is the loss sustained when expenses exceed total revenue and the gross income is the total income received before expenses are deducted.

The net income is the income that remains when expenses have been subtracted from total revenue and the gross income is the loss sustained when expenses exceed total revenue.

To understand the difference between net income and gross income, it’s crucial to grasp the basic definitions and implications of each term in the context of financial accounting and business operations.
Gross income, also known as gross revenue or total revenue, is the total amount of money generated from the business’s primary activities before any costs or expenses are deducted. This figure represents the initial earnings from sales of goods or services, and it does not account for any operational expenses, taxes, or other deductions. Gross income gives an overview of the earning capacity of a business but does not provide a clear picture of profitability.
Net income, on the other hand, is the amount of money that remains after all operating expenses, cost of goods sold (COGS), taxes, and additional financial charges have been subtracted from the gross income. This figure is also known as the bottom line, net profit, or net earnings. Net income provides a more accurate measure of a company’s financial health and efficiency, as it reflects the actual profit after all necessary and obligatory payments have been made.
The distinction between these two figures is critical for stakeholders, as gross income illustrates the potential of a business to generate sales, while net income shows the actual profitability, taking all costs into account. Thus, while gross income measures the total revenue, net income measures the profitability and is a better indicator of a company’s financial success and operational efficiency.
It’s important to note that high gross income does not necessarily translate to high net income. A business may have high sales (high gross income) but also high costs, which can significantly reduce the net income. Hence, both indicators are essential for a comprehensive evaluation of a business’s financial performance.
In summary, while gross income provides a broad view of the income generated, net income offers a deeper insight into the company’s financial status after accounting for all expenditures. Understanding both helps in making informed financial, investment, and management decisions.

質問124、 Nursing practice acts are determined on which level?

Federal.

Local.

State.

City.

Nursing practice acts, which define the scope of nursing practice and establish the rules for the profession, are determined at the state level. This means that each state in the United States has its own set of laws and regulations that govern nursing practices within its jurisdiction. The reason for state-level determination is to allow customization and flexibility to address the specific healthcare needs and legal environments of each state.
The state-specific nature of these acts ensures that the nursing standards are tailored to the unique demographics, health challenges, and resources of the state. For example, a state with a large rural population might have different regulations concerning the distribution of medical resources or telehealth than a state with a predominantly urban population.
Each state has a Board of Nursing or a similar regulatory body responsible for creating and enforcing these laws. These boards set standards for safe nursing care, determine the requirements for obtaining and retaining a nursing license, and take disciplinary actions if necessary. They also oversee the educational standards for nursing programs within the state to ensure that the training meets the state’s health care needs.
By having nursing practice acts determined at the state level rather than at a federal or local level, it ensures a more uniform and regulated approach within that state while still allowing for significant variation across different states. This system can adapt to local needs and changes in the healthcare environment more dynamically than if governed at a federal level. Furthermore, since healthcare facilities often operate under state jurisdiction, aligning nursing regulations with state laws facilitates smoother management and compliance.
Thus, when considering the regulations that impact nursing practice, it is important for nurses and nursing students to be familiar with their specific state’s nursing practice act. This knowledge is crucial not only for compliance but also for providing the best possible care within the legal framework of their respective states.

質問125、 There are three elements to qualifying for coverage by the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). Which of the following is NOT one of these elements?

specific criteria from plan coverage

qualified beneficiaries

qualifying events

qualified benefits

The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) provides former employees, retirees, spouses, former spouses, and dependent children the right to temporary continuation of health coverage at group rates. This coverage, however, is only available when coverage is lost due to specific qualifying events. There are three main elements that determine eligibility for COBRA coverage: the plan coverage, the qualifying events, and qualified beneficiaries.
The first element, **plan coverage**, requires that the employer maintains a group health plan-a health plan that covers employees and their families. This includes plans maintained by private-sector employers and state or local governments. Federal government employees are covered by a different law and are not eligible for COBRA.
The second element, **qualifying events**, are specific events that cause individuals to lose their health coverage. The type of qualifying event determines who the qualified beneficiaries are and the amount of time that a plan must offer health coverage under COBRA. Qualifying events for employees may include voluntary or involuntary job loss (except in cases of gross misconduct), reduction in the hours worked, transition between jobs, death, or other life events.
The third element, **qualified beneficiaries**, refers to individuals who were covered by a group health plan on the day before a qualifying event occurred. This can include the employee and their family members such as a spouse and dependent children. In certain cases, a retired employee, their spouse and dependent children can be qualified beneficiaries.
Contrary to the options provided in the question, **qualified benefits** are not considered an element for qualifying for COBRA coverage. Instead, “qualified benefits” generally refer to the types of benefits provided under the group health plan. Under COBRA, the same type of health coverage that the plan provided before the qualifying event must continue to be available to qualified beneficiaries after the qualifying event. This can include not only medical visits and procedures, but also dental and vision care, and prescription drug benefits, among others. This term is not used to determine eligibility for COBRA, but rather describes the scope of what is covered.
Therefore, the answer to the question is “qualified benefits,” as this term does not represent one of the core elements required to qualify for COBRA coverage. Instead, it pertains to the scope of coverage continued under the Act after a qualifying event has already been determined to apply.

2026年08月実際に出るNEA-BC試験問題集には正確で更新された問題 [Q101-Q125]

コメントを残すコメントをキャンセル

関連認証

NEA-BC 練習テスト

最近の投稿

アーカイブ

カテゴリー

2026年08月実際に出るNEA-BC試験問題集には正確で更新された問題 [Q101-Q125]

コメントを残す コメントをキャンセル

関連認証

NEA-BC 練習テスト

最近の投稿

アーカイブ

カテゴリー

コメントを残すコメントをキャンセル